The war for the Union, 1861-1865 : facts vs. the misrepresentations and boastful claims of the South.

noyes, isaac p. (isaac pitman)

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Description

Caption title. Signed and dated: Isaac P. Noyes, Washington, D.C., February 22, 1902. Also available in digital form.

Source connections

View digitized resource ↗

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

noyes, isaac p. (isaac pitman). 1902. The war for the Union, 1861-1865 : facts vs. the misrepresentations and boastful claims of the South.. https://www.loc.gov/item/36024690/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related LOC records

Library of Congress2015

Challenge to Europe : the growing refugee crisis : hearing before Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, and Emerging Threats of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, first session, November 4, 2015

"Serial No. 114-119." Shipping list no.: 2016-0130-P. Also available on the Internet as a PDF file. Description based on print version record; resource not viewed.

european union countries↗

Library of Congress2013

Update on the situation in Syria : hearing before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, April 17, 2013

Shipping list no.: 2014-0085-P. Also available on the Internet as a PDF file. Description based on print version record; resource not viewed.

syria↗

Library of Congress2004

Shame and ostracism Union Army deserters leave home

"During the Civil War not all men served honorably and this was known by everyone in their communities. We study how shame and ostracism affect behavior by examining whether men who deserted from the Union Army, and who faced no legal sanctions once the war was over, returned home or whether they moved and re-invented themselves. We build a unique panel data set that provides us with a control group for deserters because we can identify men who deserted but then returned to fight with their companies. We find that, compared to non-deserters and returned deserters, deserters were more likely to move both out of state and further distances. This effect was stronger for deserters from pro-war communities. When deserters moved they were more likely to move to anti-war states than non-deserters. Our study provides a rare test of the empirical implications of emotion. While both shame and ostracism would push deserters out of their home community, we find no evidence that deserters faced economic sanctions"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

civil war↗