Search Library of Congress⌕ Search
Home/Archive/Library of Congress

Library of Congress · 2024884487

Cotton claims. Letter from the Secretary of the Treasury, in response to a resolution of the House of March 14, 1876, transmitting statement of cotton claims presented and paid by Secretary of Treasury from January 1, 1865, to June 30, 1876. August 10, 1876. -- Referred to the Committee on Expenditures in the Treasury Department and ordered to be printed

united states. department of the treasury·united states congress. house·united states. congress. house·united states. government publishing office
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Description

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

civil warcottonfinancial statementsunited stateslegislative materialsrevenuefactory and trade wasteclaimsenemy propertygovernment publicationhistorysearches and seizuresabandonment of propertybook44th congress, 1st sessioncatalogunited states congressional serial set: serial no. 1691law library of congressunited states congressional serial set (bound house and senate documents and reports)

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

united states. department of the treasury, united states congress. house, united states. congress. house, united states. government publishing office. 1876. Cotton claims. Letter from the Secretary of the Treasury, in response to a resolution of the House of March 14, 1876, transmitting statement of cotton claims presented and paid by Secretary of Treasury from January 1, 1865, to June 30, 1876. August 10, 1876. -- Referred to the Committee on Expenditures in the Treasury Department and ordered to be printed. https://www.loc.gov/item/2024884487/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related LOC records

Library of Congress2004

Shame and ostracism Union Army deserters leave home

"During the Civil War not all men served honorably and this was known by everyone in their communities. We study how shame and ostracism affect behavior by examining whether men who deserted from the Union Army, and who faced no legal sanctions once the war was over, returned home or whether they moved and re-invented themselves. We build a unique panel data set that provides us with a control group for deserters because we can identify men who deserted but then returned to fight with their companies. We find that, compared to non-deserters and returned deserters, deserters were more likely to move both out of state and further distances. This effect was stronger for deserters from pro-war communities. When deserters moved they were more likely to move to anti-war states than non-deserters. Our study provides a rare test of the empirical implications of emotion. While both shame and ostracism would push deserters out of their home community, we find no evidence that deserters faced economic sanctions"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

civil war↗