Search Library of Congress⌕ Search
Home/Archive/Library of Congress

Library of Congress · 2024809919

In the Senate of the United States. April 17, 1888. -- Ordered to be printed. Mr. Quay, from the Committee on Pensions, submitted the following report. (To accompany Bill S. 1926.) The Committee on Pensions, to whom was referred the Bill (S. 1926) granting a pension to William Smith, have examined the same, and report the following facts and conclusion

united states. government publishing office·united states. congress. senate·united states congress. senate. committee on pensions·quay, matthew stanley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Description

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

civil warlegislative materialsclaimsgovernment publicationmilitary pensionsdisabled veteranshistorylegislative amendmentsunited statesbook50th congress, 1st sessionlaw library of congresscatalogunited states congressional serial set (bound house and senate documents and reports)united states congressional serial set: serial no. 2523

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

united states. government publishing office, united states. congress. senate, united states congress. senate. committee on pensions, quay, matthew stanley. 1888. In the Senate of the United States. April 17, 1888. -- Ordered to be printed. Mr. Quay, from the Committee on Pensions, submitted the following report. (To accompany Bill S. 1926.) The Committee on Pensions, to whom was referred the Bill (S. 1926) granting a pension to William Smith, have examined the same, and report the following facts and conclusion. https://www.loc.gov/item/2024809919/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related LOC records

Library of Congress2004

Shame and ostracism Union Army deserters leave home

"During the Civil War not all men served honorably and this was known by everyone in their communities. We study how shame and ostracism affect behavior by examining whether men who deserted from the Union Army, and who faced no legal sanctions once the war was over, returned home or whether they moved and re-invented themselves. We build a unique panel data set that provides us with a control group for deserters because we can identify men who deserted but then returned to fight with their companies. We find that, compared to non-deserters and returned deserters, deserters were more likely to move both out of state and further distances. This effect was stronger for deserters from pro-war communities. When deserters moved they were more likely to move to anti-war states than non-deserters. Our study provides a rare test of the empirical implications of emotion. While both shame and ostracism would push deserters out of their home community, we find no evidence that deserters faced economic sanctions"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

civil war↗